🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in readership and most voters leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the system frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of ballots that came in after that and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, where Cuomo would have basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner gained half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump last year went for Zohran this year. However it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus it’s not certain, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it because then no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He lost any district in any area. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many Republicans on the island who had a high participation. I think occurred significant tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it before Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for Cuomo. So there was some opposition. However overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if the candidate was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. And also, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if existed major surprises here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives come from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.