🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration is no longer a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that those in power grant or withhold at their discretion. This represents the implication of proposed measures that the current government is advancing, which would determine when and where demonstrations can occur, with possible imprisonment for those who defy these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Earlier administrations had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement extensive new authorities, which global rights bodies had censured as "significant and undue limitations" on civil liberties. Collectively, these incremental attacks on liberty have practically eliminated the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Using Tragedy to Justify Suppression

The latest restrictive measures are being justified by citing last week's heinous anti-Jewish attack on a Manchester Islamic center. There should be widespread consensus that the security of British Jews must be protected. However, using this atrocity as a pretext to suppress opposition is not only disconnected to that duty but perverts it.

"When you cannot draw the line at genocide, you probably cannot draw the line at democracy," observed a well-known American author, whose words that rings true for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Consider Britain's long tradition of public demonstration and activism against racial discrimination and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were branded as radicals in their era, even while they were advocating the freedoms of marginalized groups.

Present Situation

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's actually happening: Israel – a foreign state – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have described as genocide. Its military actions have led the global justice body to release legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

Western public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of the public think Israel has probably committed war crimes. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on arms sales to the state, and back the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely lost the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now exploiting a vile antisemitic crime to try to silence a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government appears to be included in this attempt. Government officials have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to proceed.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to intervene.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish identity with the actions of the Israeli state is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately challenged for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've reached a point where law enforcement can propose that demonstrations opposing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "accidentally or deliberately" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have stated that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "complicit" in supposed mistreatment experienced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israel's army killed numerous of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from two years of ongoing violence that have taken many thousands of lives. British politicians and news organizations have barely concealed the limited value they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest expressions of discrimination in contemporary society.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already passed a concerning threshold by banning a specific activist group, a peaceful, anti-genocide activist collective. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been detained, primarily for holding signs opposing genocide and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those detained are pensioners; including a retired priest and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker implied that some were "connected to" other nations, while the current president characterized such demonstrations as antisemitic. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on freedom of expression in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to control opposition. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears fought, endured hardship and died to establish our liberties. We may ultimately rue how casually we allowed them to slip away.